THURSDAY, April 25 (HealthDay News) -- Autism risk may be spotted at
birth by examining placentas for abnormalities, new research suggests.
"We
can look at the placenta at birth and determine the chance of being at
risk for autism with extremely high reliability," said Dr. Harvey
Kliman, a research scientist at Yale University. One of 88 U.S. children
has an autism spectrum disorder, the umbrella name for complex brain
development disorders marked by problems with social interaction and
communication, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
The earlier autism is treated, the better the outcome.
But children typically aren‘t diagnosed until behavioral symptoms
begin, perhaps at age 2 or 3 years, or even later. Kliman said the
children identified as at risk at birth might benefit from early
treatment.
For the new study, published online April 25 in the journal Biological Psychiatry,
Kliman and his team examined 117 placentas from newborns whose mothers
already had one or more children with some form of autism, which put the
infant at higher risk for the disorder. The researchers compared those
samples with placenta samples from 100 women who already had one or more
typically developing children.
During pregnancy, the placenta
keeps the unborn baby‘s blood supply separate from the mother‘s while
providing the baby with oxygen and nutrients. At delivery, the placenta,
also called the afterbirth, follows the baby out of the womb.
The
placentas from women whose older children had autism were markedly
different from the others, Kliman‘s team found. They zeroed in on
abnormal folds and abnormal cell growth in the placenta, known as
trophoblast inclusions.
The placentas from the at-risk pregnancies
were eight times more likely to have two or more of these abnormal
folds than samples from not-at-risk deliveries. Placentas with four or
more of the inclusions predicted an infant with at least a 74 percent
probability of being at risk for autism, the researchers said.
"There were no [placentas from pregnancies not at risk] that had more than two of the folds," Kliman said.
The study only predicted risk of autism, however, not actual autism. The researchers will continue to follow the children.
The testing can‘t be done before delivery, Kliman said. "You need enough placenta [to examine]."
But
the test could help spot at-risk children much earlier than is now
possible, Kliman suggested. "There is no way [currently] to know at
birth that your child might have autism," he said. "If you know you have
a child who is at risk for autism at birth, you are ahead of the game."
Interventions can begin early, when the brain is more open to change.
How
the folds in the placenta relate to autism risk isn‘t clear, Kliman
said. He and others speculated that the abnormalities in the placentas
and the brains of the children affected with autism are marked by
increased cellular growth, which then leads to the unusual folding. "The
heads of children with autism are bigger," he said. Their brains grow
rapidly early in life.
"I‘d like to see it as a routine test,"
Kliman said. The test is labor intensive and requires pathology,
however, and Kliman estimated it could cost $2,000 or more.
This
isn‘t the first study to link placental abnormalities with autism risk,
said Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer for Autism Speaks, an
advocacy and research group. "However, it is one of the largest studies
to confirm this finding," she said.
But more research is needed to confirm the findings, she said.
It
is too soon to suggest this as a routine test, said Dr. Daniel Coury,
medical director of the group‘s Autism Treatment Network and chief of
developmental and behavioral pediatrics at Nationwide Children‘s
Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. He praised the study, but also said more
research is needed to duplicate the findings.
"Being able to identify those infants at greater risk so we can target our interventions is really big news," he said.
The
study was supported by the National Institutes of Health; the MIND
Institute at the University of California, Davis; Yale University
Reproductive and Placental Research Unit; and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. The researchers don‘t hold patents on the procedure
or have financial interests in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment